How I Organise the SaaS Subscription Stack for a Small Consulting Team

At the end of last quarter, I stopped mid-task while pulling up invoices for our team's shared accounts. Notion, Slack, Miro, Loom, Zoom, Calendly, HubSpot, Airtable — £870 per month combined. I suspected it was excessive for a four-person team, but seeing the actual figures was another thing entirely. The problem wasn't that it was "expensive" — it was that things overlapped. We were posting content on a Miro board, then reorganising it in Notion, and running an Airtable tracker alongside a HubSpot pipeline.

Here's the audit routine I started using from that point on.

Lay Out Your Entire Stack on One Page

All you need is a single spreadsheet. Five columns: tool name, monthly cost, primary user (team member initials), core purpose, and whether it's replaceable. I expected it to take 30 minutes to fill in, but it took over an hour. I had to dig through email inboxes to work out who was subscribed to which plan.

One tip: if payments through the team email account are mixed in with ones charged to personal cards and then expensed, things will slip through the cracks. I filtered our bank statement CSV by "subscription" and key vendor names to catch the missing items.

Laptop screen showing a detailed SaaS subscription tracking spreadsheet

Map Out Feature Overlap

Once the spreadsheet is complete, group everything by the "core purpose" column. In my case, four main clusters emerged.

  • Project management and documentation
  • Client communication and scheduling
  • CRM and pipeline tracking
  • Visual assets and workshop collaboration

If there are two or more tools in a single cluster, they're candidates. I listed the overlapping features between Miro and Notion — kanban boards, timeline views — and checked how many times I'd opened a Miro board in the past 60 days. The answer was three. It had only been used for a single client workshop.

Two Questions to Ask Before You Cut

Before dropping a tool, I always check the following.

  • Does this tool have a unique feature, or can the tools we're keeping cover 90% or more of what it does?
  • If we cut this tool, will it actually break any team member's workflow?

The second question matters more. A colleague at the Glasgow office was using Loom every week for client briefings, but since I barely used it, I nearly wrote it off as something we could cut. That's context I would have missed if I hadn't asked directly.

Two consultants discussing tool usage in a small office setting

After the Cleanup

It took two days to cancel Miro and migrate Airtable to Notion databases — less of a migration, more of a restructure of existing Airtable views inside Notion. Monthly costs dropped from £870 to around £580. The £290 difference isn't revolutionary, but the real benefit is that the question "Where does this data live?" comes up far less often.

I repeat this audit every quarter. I don't always end up cutting something — I also use it to decide when it's time to add a new tool. When you can see your stack clearly, decisions come faster.

Comments