The Absurdity of "Consumer Prices"

Capitalism has a peculiar trait: the price of everything except assets tends to fall. Take computers, for instance—devices once powerful enough to send men to the moon are now held in everyone’s hands as smartphones, costing less than a million won. It’s an astonishing achievement, but as the price of goods falls, so too does the price of life.

If we look at a news article from 2013, the average starting salary at Korea’s top 1,000 companies was 33.52 million won. And in 2024, eleven years later? The increase is almost negligible. The average salary has only crept up to the low 40-million won range, and in the case of public institutions, it remains around 34 million won at best. In many cases, it's under 30 million. Even after a decade, wage growth lags far behind inflation.

This isn’t just a recent trend. A look into the history of capitalism in the world's most powerful nation—America—makes this clear. In the 1960s, a single male earner could support a family of four, buy a two-story house within a decade, and drive a mid-sized Ford. But by the 1980s, one income was no longer enough. Women were pushed into the labor market, and since then, things have only worsened. Supporting a family has become a struggle for both parents.

Meanwhile, repeated financial bubbles emerged, fueled by the illusion that “money makes money.” The financial sector made enormous profits, and the losses? They were covered by taxpayer money.

Moral hazard isn’t limited to Wall Street. It’s rampant across industries. In a capitalist market, survival demands cheaper, better products. This relentless race to the bottom means lower prices for goods—but also a brutal underpricing of labor. Everyone is forced to compete for crumbs.

Naturally, expensive human labor is constantly being replaced by cheaper alternatives—machines, algorithms, automation. In the process, the value of human life and labor steadily erodes.

If we compare salaries between 2013 and 2024, which sector saw the greatest rise? Unsurprisingly, it's finance. Finance alone remains fattened while the value of all other labor steadily collapses. What does this imply? In a system that covers debt with more debt, those without assets are left with only one role: slaves to money, to taxes, to debt.

We earn wages to repay debts, to pay taxes. Yet we have no idea where that money goes or how it’s used.

We are living through a widening wealth gap, pushing more and more people to either extreme. Sometimes the well-fed speak as if they’ve achieved “financial freedom.” But the truth is, they too are just better-fed prisoners of capital. Nothing changes the fact that they remain slaves to money.

So how do we escape this terrifying cycle?

Perhaps humanity has yet to find the answer.

And yet, a part of me wants to see where this society, built on exploitation, ultimately ends up.

Comments

    More from Howdy의 블로그

    See all posts

    궤변(诡辩)은 무엇인가? 어느날 아이가 장자에게 물었다. "궤변이 무엇입니까?" 장자가 되물었다. "우리 집에 손님 둘이 왔다. 한 명은 아주 깨끗하고, 한 명은 아주 더러웠다. 내가 둘 다 목욕하라고 하면 누가 씻을 것 같니?" 아이가 대답했다. "당연히 더러운 사람이겠죠!" 장자가…

    Sanghoon Han

    궤변(诡辩)

    Hearts 1Comments 110/11/2026

    특별한 법칙은 아니지만 자주 생각하려는 법칙이 있다. 향기의 법칙이라고 명명한 이 법칙은 무척이나 간단하다. 어떠한 상황에서든 상대를 유혹하라는 것이다. 원하는 것이 있다면 상대방이 원하도록 유혹하는 것이다. 이는 아주 간단한 원칙인데 동시에 매우 달성하기 어려운 법칙이기도 하다. 향…

    Sanghoon Han

    향기의 법칙

    Hearts 1Comments 110/07/2026

    하루가 멀다하고 사고가 터지는 것이 인간사. 인간이 만든 것 중 무엇이 대단하다 말할 수 있을까. 무엇이 완전하다 말할 수 있을까. 무엇이 영원하다 말할 수 있을까. 영원한 것은 단 하나도 없고 먼지가 쌓이지 않는 것도 단 하나도 없다. 기회 역시 영원하지 않아서 영원할 것 같은 젊음…

    Sanghoon Han

    영원하지 않다

    Hearts 1Comments 110/07/2026

    이카루스는 태양에 가까이 가면 안된다는 것을 알았으나 높게 날았다. 깃을 붙인 밀납이 녹아 깃이 떨어져 나가고 나서야 그는 자신의 미래를 보았다. 자유로 향하는 날개를 얻었을 때 태양을 향해서도 바다를 향해서도 안됐다. 고도를 유지하며, 섬세하게 바람을 타지 않는다면 어디로든 날아갈…

    Sanghoon Han

    자유의 날개

    Hearts 2Comments 210/07/2026